In group assessments, how should success be measured if team members have different grading criteria?

Measuring success in group assessments based on individual contributions is important because it ensures that each member's efforts and input are recognized, regardless of differing grading criteria. This approach allows for a fair evaluation of every team member's performance, acknowledging that team dynamics can vary greatly and that not all contributions may be visible in a group setting.

By focusing on individual contributions, you create a framework that promotes accountability among team members. It encourages each person to take ownership of their responsibilities and fosters a sense of pride in their work, which can enhance overall group performance. Additionally, this method helps identify those who might be struggling or excelling, allowing for targeted support or recognition as necessary.

While group success is certainly an important factor, it could potentially obscure individual contributions, especially if one or two team members dominate the performance. Similarly, measuring success solely on empathy, support, or time management might overlook the actual input and effectiveness of individuals in achieving the group's goals. Therefore, evaluating based on individual contributions strikes a balance between team collaboration and individual accountability.